Plagiarism And Its Effect On Society Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Plagiarism And Its Effect On Society. Answer: Thesis Statement: Plagiarism has a bad influence on the Society Plagiarism refers to the stealing of the language, thoughts and ideas of another author. It occurs when an individual copies elements from the work of another author and passes it off as his own. It is indicative of wrongful appropriation and is an act of academic dishonesty. It leads to the breach of the ethics related to journalism. It is subjected to different kinds of sanctions like penalty and suspension. The notion that the original is an ideal rose in Europe in the 18th century with the dawning of the Romantic movement. Plagiarism is not a crime in itself but it constitutes the issue of copyright infringement (Anglil-Carter 2014). It is generally held that the idea of plagiarism and that of copyright infringement overlap considerably. Plagiarism cannot be punished by the law but it is the educational institutions that punish instances of plagiarism. Minimum amount of plagiarism exists in the educational sector in which a person commits plagiarism by the substitution of the synonyms. Falsification along with fabrication also account for major offences besides that of plagiarism. Alteration of the research materials and the result of the research not being reflected in the proper manner leads to falsification. This has a bearing on the credibility of research. According to White (2013), act relating to overt plagiarism is a failure in terms of personal integrity. It shows lack of the element of professionalism. An experience at the geriatric fellowship has shown that problem pertaining to plagiarism is more wide spread than it is recognized. It was found that three out of the total of 26 applications was consisting of plagiarized portions from that of a single website. It has been stated by Louw and Pieterse (2015) that this kind of incident of documentation of plagiarism can help in raising awareness among that of the medical edu cators. Some of the citizens do not recognize the fact that copying from sources verbatim amounts to plagiarism. According to Weber-Wulff (2014), plagiarism is not synonymous with the concept of copyright infringement. They are indicative of different concepts. False claims in relation to authorship constitute the issue of plagiarism irrespective of the factor whether the material has been protected by copyright. The violation of the rights of the copyright holder is termed as copyright infringement and in this case material of a person (restricted by virtue of copyright) is used without his consent. Plagiarism on the other hand refers to the unearned increment of plagiarizing of the reputation of an author. It refers to achieving false claim of that of authorship and it is a moral offence to the audience of the plagiarist (Chien 2014). It is also considered to be an offence for those who has provided the particular plagiarist with the benefit. The publisher of the plagiarist is also committing an act of moral offense in this kind of a case. In the field of academia, plagiarism is held to be an act of academic dishonesty and the offenders are subjected to expulsion. There are certain institutions that make use of plagiarism detected software in order to uncover instances of potential plagiarism. According to Stuhmcke, Booth and Wangmann (2016), plagiarism is not an innovative problem and dependence on the factor of internet has increased the opportunities in relation to plagiarism. The careless cutting and pasting poses problem for the unwary users of Internet. There are a large number of websites in the present age that provides students with the opportunity to download term papers free of cost. It has been argued by Appiah (2016) that they tend to present themselves as research assistance but they offer possibilities relating to plagiarism. They tend to provide guidance to the students who are under undue pressure. It is mentioned over there that students should use the papers like models. It has been argued by Dalal ( 2015) that the students in haste often end up using the material of the papers that amounts to plagiarism. The authors credentials should always be asked because a paper that is anonymous can be indicative of another student. Level Three Plagiarism is considered to be a very serious form of plagiarism. It occurs when the conduct of the student is dishonest and the plagiarism compromise the process of assessment. This occurs when the work has been got from that of another person. It happens when the work of the student is similar to that of the work of other student that is inclusive of that of assignment of the previous years. Large sections are copied from that of other source and it is presented in a manner as if it is his own work. The lack of necessary citation also leads to academic misconduct. Plagiarism cannot be simply be termed as a black-and-white issue. According to Amos (2014), boundary between that of plagiarism and that of research is indistinct. On the event of the writer writing from the work of another author leads to plagiarism. When the writer copies from that of different sources and retains the original phrasing then it amounts to plagiarism. The retaining of the content of the source but changing of key phrases paves the path for plagiarism. It is found that when the writer borrows from his previous work then it also violates the policies relating to plagiarism. Self-plagiarism can be defined in three manners within the relevant literature (Anglil-Carter 2014). It means the publishing of paper that overlaps with that of another paper and it is not acknowledged properly. Dividing a large paper into that of smaller papers and then publishing them on separate basis can be tantamount to that of plagiarism. Scientific integrity is dependent on honesty along with that of transparency of method that transfers knowledge. It has been argued by Bruton and Childers (2016) that re-publishing the same results in different papers and multiple recalculations of that of the same result can lead to errors in the process of research. Redundant publication takes place in case of an overlap between the two papers. This includes the overlapping with that of another author and their results. According to Risquez, ODwyer and Ledwith (2013), re-publishing done in a deceptive manner cannot be accepted and it points forward to three problems. It can be unethical, waste the resources and has bad impact on that of future research decision. Redundant publication can mislead readers and reduce credibility in relation to the journal. It can prove to be a hindrance in the area of attracting good papers. Duplicate publication waste the resources and it wastes the time that should be allocated to that of other pape r. Plagiarism not only exists in the field of education but in different sectors like that of music, journalism, movies and literature. Music Plagiarism refers to the imitation of the music of another author and it exists in two contexts- musical idea or that of sampling. In the arena of classical music, there is a software that can automatically generate music in style of that of another composer. David Cope has written down software system by the name of Experiments in Musical Intelligence (Yadav, Rawal and Baxi 2016). It can analyze from that of existing music by human composer in order to generate new musical composition. In the case of classical music, there are certain software that can generate music automatically in another composers style by making use of the musical analysis of the works. According to McGinnis (2013), sampling is an area of argument from the point of view of the legal. The sampling artists of the earlier era made use of the recordings of other artists without asking for their permission. Hip hop and other forms of music started to incorporate samples and became rich. Original artists hence started to take legal action and claimed infringement of copyright. In the present age, most of the artists obtain authorization before using the samples which is termed as clearing (Lewis and Zhong 2013). They gain permission so that they can use the sample by the payment of upfront fee. Movies provide entertainment but plagiarism has pervaded this world of entertainment. According to Lewis (2013), movies were initially meant to be original in terms of concept and artistic however it has deviated a lot from its original purpose. Plagiarism has affected world of movie making and the manner in which movies are played. In the world of movies, one copies or acquires data from that of another movie and create a movie as if it is ones original. It is the duty of authorities releasing movie to check originality in terms of the print. It is their responsibility to determine the extent of the plagiarism. There are definite standard to which plagiarism can be allowed but beyond a certain point it can seriously injure the business of the particular movie from which matter has been copied (Louw and Pieterse 2015). There are certain measures that should be adopted so that the movie-makers do not indulge themselves in the negative act of plagiarism. In the present age, plagiarism has reached the zenith and sound effect, back ground and technique is being copied from that of another source. In terms of journalism, plagiarism is the breach in relation to journalistic ethics. Reporters who are caught in the act of plagiarizing have to withstand disciplinary measures that can range from that of suspension to that of termination in relation to employment. According to Groshek and Conway (2013), there are some individuals who tend to claim that they have plagiarized unintentionally as they have failed to include the quotations. The developing of the Internet in which articles appear in the form of electronic text has made the process of copying many times easier. An incident that shook the world of journalism was the author named Neil Harman who was a well-known tennis correspondent being accused of plagiarism. He acted as the official Wimbledon Annual for the year 2013 which had been written down by him ten years earlier. Harman was removed from task of writing down the annual but his press access was not revoked (Groshek and Conway 2013). It was responsible for creating a lot of controversy however the book continued to be sold for many months within the gift shop. The public came to know about this issue in the year 2014 and Harman resigned from that of the International Tennis Writers Association. London Times also suspended him as the investigation was pending. According to Lewis (2013), the fall of grace of a person of stature like Neil Harman shook the world of journalism. This issue stood out owing to the fact of the role played by Wimbledon that is a reputed organization in the field of Tennis. Harman failed in duties in relation to the author and simultaneously tennis club also failed to deliver its duty as an employer. It failed in detecting plagiarism in the work of Harman but also did not remove the book quickly that compelled the issue to come to surface. Employers along with editors have to play an important role in relation to plagiarism especially when the issue of plagiarism has been detected. Wimbledon thus failed to fulfil its duty. Journalism does great service in delivering news to the public and this is a medium that is greatly relied upon by the common people (Tandoc and Jenkins 2017). Incidents like this shake the faith of the public in journalistic figures and tarnish the image of the sector of journalism. It is the dut y of journalism to expose incidents of crime and other aberrations from that of the normal course. The public will think twice before believing in the world of the media from next time onwards. This incidents related to plagiarism has an extremely negative impact on the society and moral consciousness on the part of the people can help in avoiding theses kind of incidents. Literature is another arena in which acts of plagiarism is rampant. Literary theft occurs when language and thought process of that of another author is imitated without crediting name of original author. According to Katz et al. (2016), the unauthorized use can put into jeopardy the original writer and hurt immensely the reputation of the author who is involved in the act of plagiarism. The iconic fashion designer called Vivienne Westwood had been accused of plagiarism in relation to her memoir. Paul Gorman who is an author of The Look: Adventures in Rock and Pop Fashion had been responsible for the allegations. It was claimed by him that there were 40 pages that bore similarity to his books. Later on, he shifted the blame from that of Westwood to the co-author of the book called Ian Kelly. Westwood is a big name in the world of fashion. The memoir was able to sell extremely well because of her unique position within the industry. A memoir is supposed to be a personal work that reflects the thought of author in a very intimate manner. It has been argued by Anglil-Carter (2014), that it is supposed to mirror the life of the author and the allegation of plagiarism had grave impact on the name of Westwood. The popularity of the book was greatly shaken owing to this incident and it completely tarnished the credibility of the memoir. It could have been a jewel in the career of Westwood but this act of plagiarism completely destroyed her public image. The memoir is a personal work and it should have been ensured that it is devoid of any kind of plagiarism. The editor along with that of the publisher had failed to serve their duty. Plagiarism can shroud in darkness the professional career of an individual. The plagiarism can be asked to leave the job and he can also be fired. It becomes difficult for the individual to search for employment within the same field. Public figures have to face severe consequences and it destroys the reputation of the individual in front of the public. The individual reading the plagiarized material may be unaware that the work has been copied from that of another work. It is thus a blow for the element of credibility of an individual. The public becomes gullible since they are unaware that the work has been copied from another source. Plagiarism is an old problem that still persists in the society and the spread of internet has increased the cases of plagiarism. Cutting along with pasting that is done carelessly adds to the problem of plagiarism. There are many websites that allow the students with opportunity to download paper. This also adds to the problem of plagiarism and level three plagiarism occurs owing to academic misconduct. Self-plagiarism occurs when one paper is published that overlaps with that of another paper without proper acknowledgement. Division of a large paper into many small papers can also cause plagiarism. Plagiarism not only occurs in education but also in music, literature and journalism. Journalism is supposed to reveal true incidents and the act of Neil Harman has destroyed the image attributed to the media before the public. It has a bad impact on the society and destroys the credibility of the journalism. The accusation of plagiarism against fashion designer Vivienne Westwood has been a blow to the literary career of the writer. Memoir should mirror the actual facts and should be a portrayal of the real life of an individual. References: Amos, K.A., 2014. The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations.Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA,102(2), p.87. Anglil-Carter, S., 2014.Stolen language?: Plagiarism in writing. Routledge. Appiah, M.K., 2016. Incidence of Plagiarism Among Undergraduate Students in Higher Educational Institutions in Ghana.International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences (IMPACT FACTOR6.225),6(3). Bruton, S. and Childers, D., 2016. The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism: a qualitative study of faculty views on student plagiarism and Turnitin.Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education,41(2), pp.316-330. Chien, S.C., 2014. Cultural constructions of plagiarism in student writing: Teachers' perceptions and responses.Research in the Teaching of English, pp.120-140. Dalal, N., 2015. Responding to plagiarism using reflective means.International Journal for Educational Integrity,11(1), p.4. Groshek, J. and Conway, M., 2013. The effectiveness of the pervasive method in ethics pedagogy: A longitudinal study of journalism and mass communication students.Journalism,14(3), pp.330-347. Katz, D.S., Gardner, J.B., Hoffmann, J.C., Patlas, M.N., Bhargava, P., Moshiri, M., Remer, E.M., Gould, E.S. and Smith, S., 2016. Ethical issues in radiology journalism, peer review, and research.American Journal of Roentgenology,207(4), pp.820-825. Lewis, N.P. and Zhong, B., 2013. The root of journalistic plagiarism: Contested attribution beliefs.Journalism Mass Communication Quarterly,90(1), pp.148-166. Lewis, N.P., 2013. Idea Plagiarism: Journalism's Ultimate Heist.Mass Communication and Society,16(5), pp.738-757. Louw, D. and Pieterse, V., 2015, January. Dealing with plagiarism in introductory programming. InInternational Conference on Computer Science Education Innovation Technology (CSEIT). Proceedings(p. 4). Global Science and Technology Forum. McGinnis, R., 2013.Originality and intellectual property in the French and English enlightenment. Routledge. Risquez, A., ODwyer, M. and Ledwith, A., 2013. Thou shalt not plagiarise: from self-reported views to recognition and avoidance of plagiarism.Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education,38(1), pp.34-43. Stuhmcke, A., Booth, T. and Wangmann, J., 2016. The illusory dichotomy of plagiarism.Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education,41(7), pp.982-995. Tandoc Jr, E.C. and Jenkins, J., 2017. The Buzzfeedication of journalism? How traditional news organizations are talking about a new entrant to the journalistic field will surprise you!.Journalism,18(4), pp.482-500. Weber-Wulff, D., 2014.False feathers: A perspective on academic plagiarism. Springer Science Business. White, H.O., 2013.Plagiarism and Imitation Duri Cb: A Study in Critical Distinctions(Vol. 12). Routledge. Yadav, S., Rawal, G. and Baxi, M., 2016. Plagiarism-A serious scientific misconduct.Int J Health Sci Res,6(2), pp.364-366.